Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Home » Legal News » Pharmaceutical Company Sued For Discriminating Against Women

Pharmaceutical Company Sued For Discriminating Against Women

February 27, 2013 03:41pm  
Pharmaceutical Company Sued For Discriminating Against Women


Daiichi Sankyo, a Japanese manufacturer of pharmaceuticals, faces a class action lawsuit from several women who allege that the company discriminated against women, especially those who were pregnant or mothers.  According to the lawsuit filed on behalf of six former employees of the pharma company by law firm Cravath, Swaine & Moore, Daiichi Sankyo's conduct violated both state and federal anti-discrimination laws protecting pregnant women.

The employees involved in the complaint allege that Daiichi Sankyo has no men in upper levels of management, and that the male-dominated culture of the executive floors translates into discrimination against women hired at lower levels of the company.  Women were promoted less frequently than men, according to the complaint, and were often significantly underpaid compared to their male colleagues.

While the women in the suit state that they were discriminated against even before they became pregnant, pregnancy made the discriminatory behavior of men at Daiichi Sankyo significantly worse.  The women allege that once they were pregnant, they were frequently made fun of by male colleagues.  One man referred to his female co-worker derogatorily as a “baby-maker,” while others mocked colleagues who had recently returned from maternity leave.

Women working for Daiichi Sankyo were told that pregnancy was “career suicide” and would bring their chances for promotion to a swift end.  When women attempted to take maternity leave in accordance with company policies, they were routinely paid less than they should have been, and were later told that even this reduced pay was an overpayment.  The women were forced to pay back wages that had already come to them.

The company is also accused of violating state and federal statutes allowing breastfeeding women to take break time to pump breastmilk for their infants.  This requirement was not followed by Daiichi Sankyo any time the women working for them were at locations outside of the main company office.  Women say they were forced to work long hours while uncomfortable due to being unable to express their breastmilk.

According to the complaint, the company also repeatedly denied mentoring and other career benefits to women that were routinely extended to men.  One woman claims that after giving birth, she was transferred to a different location and awarded no relocation expenses—a move she claims was in direct contravention of company policy that was followed for her male colleagues.



Must Read

Kentucky Labor Laws Breaks Kentucky Labor Laws Breaks
  Guide to Kentucky Labor Laws About Breaks If you are a worker in the state of Kentucky, you are protected by several different KY labor laws about breaks.
Massachusetts Labor Laws Breaks Massachusetts Labor Laws Breaks
  What are the Massachusetts Labor Laws Breaks? According to Massachusetts labor laws breaks, workers must be allowed a paid rest period—from their employer—of at least 10 minutes for each 4-hour shift worked.
Washington Labor Laws Breaks Washington Labor Laws Breaks
  What are the Washington Labor Laws Breaks? According to Washington labor laws breaks, workers must be allowed a paid rest period—from their employer—of at least 10 minutes for each 4-hour shift worked.
Michigan Labor Laws Breaks Michigan Labor Laws Breaks
  Quick Guide to Michigan Laws and Breaks Michigan Labor Laws: Breaks In the state of Michigan, labor law for breaks specifies that employers are not obligated to give their employees a lunch or break unless they are under the age of 18.
Alabama Labor Laws Breaks Alabama Labor Laws Breaks
  A brief guide to Alabama labor laws on breaks The state of Alabama follows the provisions of the Federal Labor Standards Act.